Prosecutors argue ‘effective altruism’ inadequate in Bankman-Fried case
Bankman-Fried’s legal counsel asserted that this argument lacks relevance and does not absolve the fraud allegations.
In the fraud trial of Sam Bankman-Fried, prosecutors have requested the judge inform the jury that the defendant’s assertion that he is an effective altruist should not serve as a legitimate defense. Bankman-Fried faces allegations of misappropriating billions of dollars from FTX customers for personal purposes, such as political contributions, real estate and investments.
In a letter presented on Thursday, the prosecution noted that Bankman-Fried’s legal counsel sought to contend that he should not be charged with fraud because he had intentions to reimburse customers through methods like FTX’s growth and profitable investments. They asserted that this argument lacks relevance and does not absolve the fraud allegations.
Bankman-Fried’s defense has endeavored to portray him as a philanthropist with a sincere commitment to creating a positive global influence. They contend that his endorsement of effective altruism, a philosophical movement promoting the most influential methods to assist others, such as charitable contributions or pursuing impactful careers, reflects his underlying motivations.
The prosecutors argue that effective altruism cannot serve as a defense against fraud. They characterize it as an “unconventional philosophy regarding the ethics of deception and theft.” In their view, this ideology has no bearing on mens rea, the mental state necessary to commission fraud.
Cointelegraph has been covering the trial on the ground in New York, which is now nearing the end of its third week. During the trial, the prosecution has presented multiple witnesses, including Caroline Ellison, former CEO of Alameda Research; Nishad Singh, former engineering chief of FTX and Alameda; and Gary Wang, a co-founder of the now-defunct FTX.
Based on their statements, Bankman-Fried directed them to obtain funds from FTX customers without their awareness or consent for purposes unrelated to FTX’s regular operations.
Related: Latest update — Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried trial [Day 12]
They also claim that Bankman-Fried had an understanding of the potential dangers and repercussions resulting from his actions. They said that he actively hid these actions from regulatory authorities, auditors and the public. As evidence, they introduced a compilation of emails, messages, spreadsheets and bank records that revealed the full scope of Bankman-Fried’s deceptive plan.
Finalizing the jury instructions is expected next week, followed by closing arguments. Subsequently, the jury will commence deliberations to determine Bankman-Fried’s legal fate.
Magazine: Can you trust crypto exchanges after the collapse of FTX?
